Project ForgeWanted Temporary, Part-time persons for the post of Field Interviewer to conduct personal interviews to collect and collate economic data. Requirements: High School-pass, must be available for Day, Evening and Saturday work. Transportation paid, expenses reimbursed.
Which one of the following is the best inference from the above advertisement?
- AGender-discriminatory
- BXenophobic
- CNot designed to make the post attractive
- Not gender-discriminatory
Explanation
The advertisement's stated requirements (a High-School pass and availability for certain hours) apply identically regardless of gender, with no gendered language anywhere in the text — so 'not gender-discriminatory' is the inference best supported by what's actually written. 'Gender-discriminatory' and 'Xenophobic' have no textual support at all, and the ad does offer concrete incentives (paid transport, reimbursed expenses), so 'not designed to be attractive' overreaches too.
Source: GATE ME 2012 (Booklet Code A) (2012)
This question is part of a 15-day revision cycle — sign in and Project Forge will bring it back the day before you'd forget it.